Results
  model coordinates only   fit to EM map   vs reference structure   vs other models   Comparative Analyses
         help
  Geometry Scores   ADPs Histogram   Accuracy Estimate
 
Target: 
Filter by method: ab-initio  optimized cryoEM model       fully automated partially automated, with some manual steps     
Per residue ProQ score
(0.8; 1.0) (0.6; 0.8) (0.4; 0.6) (0.2; 0.4) (0.0; 0.2) N/A
#     Model     Method     ProQ   
    ab-initio/
    optimized		     auto/
    man.
1. T0102EM041_2_A ab-initio auto 0.85   
2. T0102EM060_1_A ab-initio auto 0.76   
3. T0102EM082_1_A ab-initio auto 0.85   
4. T0102EM082_2_A ab-initio auto 0.83   
5. T0102EM025_1_A optimized auto 0.83   
6. T0102EM038_1_A optimized auto 0.00   
7. T0102EM010_1_A ab-initio man. 0.83   
8. T0102EM028_1_A ab-initio man. 0.81   
9. T0102EM035_1_A ab-initio man. 0.84   
10. T0102EM041_1_A ab-initio man. 0.83   
11. T0102EM054_1_A ab-initio man. 0.56   
12. T0102EM054_2_A ab-initio man. 0.84   
13. T0102EM060_2_A ab-initio man. 0.79   
14. T0102EM060_3_A ab-initio man. 0.78   
15. T0102EM073_1_A ab-initio man. 0.88   
EMDataResource
Sponsored by the US National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIH/NIGMS)
Please address any questions or queries to:
© 2015-2021