Results
  model coordinates only   fit to EM map   vs reference structure   vs other models   ligands   Comparative Analyses
         help
Target: 
Filter by method: ab-initio  optimized cryoEM model  optimized other known model  not optimized  ab-initio+optimized (mixed)
    
Filter by effort:    fully automated    partially automated, with some manual steps    manual              
Per residue DAVIS_QA score (models consensus score)
(0.8; 1.0) (0.6; 0.8) (0.4; 0.6) (0.2; 0.4) (0.0; 0.2) N/A
#     Model     Method     DAVIS_QA   
    ab-initio/
    optimized		     auto/
    man.
1. T0202EM004_1_A abinit+opt auto+man 0.93   
2. T0202EM004_2_A abinit+opt auto+man 0.81   
3. T0202EM006_1_A abinit+opt auto+man 0.93   
4. T0202EM007_1_A optim manual 0.92   
5. T0202EM001_1_A optim auto+man 0.93   
6. T0202EM001_2_A optim auto+man 0.93   
7. T0202EM001_3_A abinit+opt auto+man 0.87   
8. T0202EM013_1_A optim auto+man 0.93   
9. T0202EM010_1_A abinit+opt auto+man 0.93   
10. T0202EM011_1_A abinit+opt auto+man 0.93   
11. T0202EM012_1_A optim auto+man 0.93   
12. T0202EM005_1_A not_optim auto+man 0.93   
13. T0202EM009_1_A optim auto+man 0.93   
14. T0202EM008_1_A optim auto+man 0.93   
15. T0202EM002_1_A abinit+opt auto 0.92   
16. T0202EM002_2_A not_optim auto 0.93   
17. T0202EM003_1_A optim auto+man 0.04   
18. T0202EM003_2_A optim auto+man 0.93   
EMDataResource
Sponsored by the US National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIH/NIGMS)
Please address any questions or queries to:
© 2015-2021