Results
  model coordinates only   fit to EM map   vs reference structure   vs other models   Comparative Analyses
         help
  Model Ranks (per target)   Models Pair-wise Comparison   Scores Pair-wise Comparison   Group Ranks (across targets)
 
Target: 
Filter by method: ab-initio  optimized cryoEM model       fully automated partially automated, with some manual steps     
Score Weights:
·model coordinates only
(MP)clash:
(MP)Ram.out:
(MP)Ram.fv:
(MP)Rot.out:
Cablam(Conf-out):
Cablam(Cα-out):
Angle_RMSD:
·fit to EM map
CCC:
CCC(ov):
LAP:
ENV(noH):
MI:
SMOC(noH):
box_CC:
CC_mask:
CC_vol:
CC_peaks:
ResFSC05:
box_CC(BF0):
CC_mask(BF0):
CC_vol(BF0):
CC_peaks(BF0):
ResFSC05(BF0):
EMRinger:
Q-score(noH):
AtmIncl(All)(noH):
AtmIncl(BB):
·vs reference structure (mono), vs other models
GDT_TS:
GDT_HA:
GDC_ALL:
GDC_SC:
LDDT:
CAD:
RMSD(Cα):
DAVIS_QA:
·vs reference structure (multi)
QS(best):
QS(glob):
LDDT(o):
LDDT(w):
GDT_TS:
GDC_ALL:
GDC_SC:
RMSD(Cα):
(HB)Prec.:
(HB)Jaccard:
(HB)Prec.(>6):
(HB)Jaccard(>6):
        
#     Model     Group
    Name		 Method     Combined Z-score
    (normalized by
    the sum of weights)		     Rank
    ab-initio/
    optimized		     auto/
    man.
EMDataResource
Sponsored by the US National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIH/NIGMS)
Please address any questions or queries to:
© 2015-2021