Results
  model coordinates only   fit to EM map   vs reference structure   vs other models   Comparative Analyses
         help
  Model Ranks (per target)   Models Pair-wise Comparison   Scores Pair-wise Comparison   Group Ranks (across targets)
 
Score Weights:
·model coordinates only
(MP)clash:
(MP)Ram.out:
(MP)Ram.fv:
(MP)Rot.out:
Cablam(Conf-out):
Cablam(Cα-out):
Angle_RMSD:
·fit to EM map
CCC:
CCC(ov):
LAP:
ENV(noH):
MI:
SMOC(noH):
box_CC:
CC_mask:
CC_vol:
CC_peaks:
ResFSC05:
box CC(BF0):
CC_mask(BF0):
CC_vol(BF0):
CC_peaks(BF0):
ResFSC05(BF0):
EMRinger:
Q-score(noH):
AtmIncl(All)(noH):
AtmIncl(BB):
·vs reference structure (mono), vs other models
GDT_TS:
GDT_HA:
GDC_ALL:
GDC_SC:
LDDT:
CAD:
RMSD(Cα):
DAVIS_QA:
·vs reference structure (multi)
(HB)Prec.:
(HB)Jaccard:
(HB)Prec.(>6):
(HB)Jaccard(>6):
        
#     Group
    Code		     Group
    Name		     No.
    Targets		     Sum(Z-scores)     Rank(SumZ)     Avg(Z-scores)     Rank(AvgZ)
1 EM027 kumar 2 1.757 10 0.878 1
2 EM010 yu 8 5.932 1 0.741 2
3 EM091 chiu 4 2.829 6 0.707 3
4 EM041 arpwarp 8 5.010 2 0.626 4
5 EM082 rosetta 8 4.605 3 0.576 5
6 EM035 phenix 8 4.589 4 0.574 6
7 EM090 mbaker 4 2.114 8 0.528 7
8 EM028 ccpem 8 4.033 5 0.504 8
9 EM038 fzjuelich 6 2.135 7 0.356 9
10 EM025 cdmd 8 1.762 9 0.220 10
11 EM073 singharoy 8 1.703 11 0.213 11
12 EM054 kihara 8 -7.713 12 -0.964 12
13 EM060 deeptracer 8 -11.856 13 -1.482 13
* Ranks are calculated on Model_1s.
EMDataResource
Sponsored by the US National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIH/NIGMS)
Please address any questions or queries to:
© 2015-2021