Results
  model coordinates only   fit to EM map   vs reference structure   vs other models   ligands   Comparative Analyses
         help
  Model Ranks (per target)   Models Pair-wise Comparison   Scores Pair-wise Comparison   Group Ranks (across targets)
 
Score Weights:
·ligands
Q-score (PTQ):
Q-score (F86):
Q-score (PEE):
(MP)HOH clash:
·model coordinates only
(MP)clash:
(MP)Ram.out:
(MP)Ram.fv:
(MP)Rot.out:
(MP)MP_score:
Cablam(Conf-out):
Cablam(Cα-out):
·fit to EM map
CCC:
SMOC:
box_CC:
CC_mask:
CC_vol:
CC_peaks:
EMRinger:
Q-score:
AtmIncl(All):
AtmIncl(BB):
·vs reference structure (mono), vs other models
GDT_TS:
GDT_HA:
GDC_ALL:
GDC_SC:
LDDT:
CAD:
RMSD(Cα):
DAVIS_QA:
·vs reference structure (multi)
(HB)Prec.:
(HB)Jaccard:
(HB)Prec.(>6):
(HB)Jaccard(>6):
        
#     Group
    Code		     Group
    Name		     No.
    Targets		     Sum(Z-scores)     Rank(Sum)     Avg(Z-scores)     Rank(Avg)
1 EM005 chiu 3 1.908 1 0.636 1
2 EM016 kumar 1 0.612 8 0.612 2
3 EM009 phenix 3 1.748 2 0.583 3
4 EM006 mattbaker 3 1.729 3 0.576 4
5 EM010 chojnowski 3 1.629 4 0.543 5
6 EM015 schroeder 1 0.369 10 0.369 6
7 EM002 si 3 0.938 5 0.313 7
8 EM011 igaev 3 0.795 6 0.265 8
9 EM003 dimaio 3 0.775 7 0.258 9
10 EM012 palmer 3 0.467 9 0.156 10
11 EM013 singharoy 2 0.301 11 0.151 11
12 EM017 weyand 1 0.093 12 0.093 12
13 EM008 emsley 3 0.063 13 0.021 13
14 EM007 perez 3 -0.005 14 -0.002 14
15 EM014 kao 2 -0.701 15 -0.350 15
16 EM001 kihara 3 -1.181 16 -0.394 16
17 EM004 cheng 3 -1.573 17 -0.524 17
EMDataResource
Sponsored by the US National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIH/NIGMS)
Please address any questions or queries to:
© 2015-2021