Results
  model coordinates only   fit to EM map   vs reference structure   vs other models   ligands   Comparative Analyses
         help
  Model Ranks (per target)   Models Pair-wise Comparison   Scores Pair-wise Comparison   Group Ranks (across targets)
 
Target: 
Filter by method: ab-initio  optimized cryoEM model  optimized other known model  not optimized  ab-initio+optimized (mixed)
    
Filter by effort:    fully automated    partially automated, with some manual steps    manual              
Score Weights:
·ligands
Q-score (PTQ):
(MP)HOH clash:
·model coordinates only
(MP)clash:
(MP)Ram.out:
(MP)Ram.fv:
(MP)Rot.out:
(MP)MP_score:
Cablam(Conf-out):
Cablam(Cα-out):
MOGUL composite:
MOGUL complete:
MM (strain energy):
NNP (strain energy):
PH4 (pharmacore):
·fit to EM map
CCC:
SMOC:
box_CC:
CC_mask:
CC_vol:
CC_peaks:
EMRinger:
AtmIncl(All):
AtmIncl(BB):
Q-score:
LIVQ5 (Q-score for ligand + 5A vicinity):
LIVQ10 (Q-score for ligand + 10A vicinity):
·vs reference structure (mono), vs other models
GDT_TS:
GDT_HA:
GDC_ALL:
GDC_SC:
LDDT:
CAD:
RMSD(Cα):
DAVIS_QA:
·vs reference structure (multi)
QS(best):
QS(glob):
LDDT(o):
MMalign:
(HB)Prec.:
(HB)Jaccard:
(HB)Prec.(>6):
(HB)Jaccard(>6):
        
#     Model     Group
    Name		 Method     Combined Z-score
    (normalized by
    the sum of weights)		     Rank
    ab-initio/
    optimized		     auto/
    man.
EMDataResource
Sponsored by the US National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIH/NIGMS)
Please address any questions or queries to:
© 2015-2021