Model Ranks

EM Model Challenge - 2019

Results

model coordinates only

fit to EM map

vs reference structure

vs other models

Comparative Analyses

help

Model Ranks (per target)

Models Pair-wise Comparison

Scores Pair-wise Comparison

Group Ranks (across targets)

Score Weights:

·model coordinates only

(MP)clash:

(MP)Ram.out:

(MP)Ram.fv:

(MP)Rot.out:

Cablam(Conf-out):

Cablam(Cα-out):

Angle_RMSD:

·fit to EM map

CCC:

CCC(ov):

LAP:

ENV(noH):

MI:

SMOC(noH):

box_CC:

CC_mask:

CC_vol:

CC_peaks:

ResFSC05:

box_CC(BF0):

CC_mask(BF0):

CC_vol(BF0):

CC_peaks(BF0):

ResFSC05(BF0):

EMRinger:

Q-score(noH):

AtmIncl(All)(noH):

AtmIncl(BB):

·vs reference structure (mono), vs other models

GDT_TS:

GDT_HA:

GDC_ALL:

GDC_SC:

LDDT:

CAD:

RMSD(Cα):

DAVIS_QA:

·vs reference structure (multi)

QS(best):

QS(glob):

LDDT(o):

LDDT(w):

GDT_TS:

GDC_ALL:

GDC_SC:

RMSD(Cα):

(HB)Prec.:

(HB)Jaccard:

(HB)Prec.(>6):

(HB)Jaccard(>6):

#	Model	Group Name	Method		Combined Z-score (normalized by the sum of weights)	Rank
#	Model	Group Name	ab-initio/ optimized	auto/ man.		Rank
1	T0103EM090_1	mbaker	ab-initio	man.	0.871	1
2	T0103EM010_1	yu	ab-initio	man.	0.852	2
3	T0103EM082_2	rosetta	ab-initio	auto	0.747	3
4	T0103EM041_1	arpwarp	ab-initio	man.	0.632	4
5	T0103EM054_2	kihara	ab-initio	man.	0.505	5
6	T0103EM041_2	arpwarp	ab-initio	auto	0.436	6
7	T0103EM082_1	rosetta	ab-initio	auto	0.374	7
8	T0103EM035_1	phenix	ab-initio	man.	0.344	8
9	T0103EM028_1	ccpem	ab-initio	man.	0.342	9
10	T0103EM025_1	cdmd	optimized	auto	0.334	10
11	T0103EM038_1	fzjuelich	optimized	auto	0.189	11
12	T0103EM3ajo	-	-	-	-0.097	12
13	T0103EM073_1	singharoy	ab-initio	man.	-0.292	13
14	T0103EM054_1	kihara	ab-initio	man.	-0.502	14
15	T0103EM060_1	deeptracer	ab-initio	man.	-2.237	15
16	T0103EM060_2	deeptracer	ab-initio	man.	-2.498	16

EMDataResource
Sponsored by the US National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIH/NIGMS)
Please address any questions or queries to:
© 2015-2021